电影演员表演的可版权性分析(一)(10)
发布时间:2015-11-18 09:39商业秘密网
[18] Id. (quoting Anderson v. UnitedStates, 612 F.2d 1112, 1114 (9th Cir.1979)).
[19] Park Vill. Apartment TenantsAss'n v. Mortimer Howard Trust, 636 F.3d 1150, 1160 (9th Cir.2011).
[20] N.D. ex rel. Parents v. Haw.Dep't of Educ., 600 F.3d 1104, 1112 n. 6 (9th Cir.2010) (internal citation and quotationmarks omitted).
[21] See 17 U.S.C. ?101(“职务作品”的定义是,一个“由雇员在其本职工作范围内完成的工作”,或者是由双方签订书面协议,“经特约或委托的作品......作为活动动图的一部分......”) see also 201(b) (在涉及职务作品的案件中,雇主或者准备作品所为了的人是作者,明示协议另有规定除外。)
[22] 17 U.S.C. ?102(a).
[23] 17 U.S.C. ?101.
[24] See 1 Nimmer on Copyright 2.03.
[25] 17 U.S.C. ?101.
[26] Id.
[27] See Inhale, Inc. v. StarbuzzTobacco, Inc., 755 F.3d 1038, 1041-42 (9th Cir.2014).
[28] Southco, Inc. v. KanebridgeCorp., 390 F.3d 276, 286 n. 5 (3d Cir.2004) (en banc) (Alito, J.) (quotingYates v. Hendon, 541 U.S. 1, 3, 124 S.Ct. 1330, 158 L.Ed.2d 40 (2004)).
[29] 2 Nimmer on Copyright?7.16[B][3][b][vi].
[30] See Dissent at 38-39.
[31] See World Intellectual PropertyOrganization, Summary of the Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances (2012),available at www. wipo. int/ treaties/ en/ ip/ beijing/ summary_ beijing. html(last visited May 13, 2015).
[32] See Dissent at 751.
[33] 202 F.3d 1227 (9th Cir.2000),
[34] 17 U.S.C. ?101 (emphasis added).
[35] 202 F.3d at 1233 (internalquotation marks omitted).
[36] 202 F.3d at 1233-34; see also Richlin v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures, Inc., 531 F.3d 962, 968 (9th Cir.2008)(根据Aalmuhammed 案,在确定作者时,法院必须首先要确定被审查的作品).
[37] Blumenfeld's Dictionary of Actingand Show Business 48 (Hal Leonard Corp. 2009).
[38]电影《宾虚》中的信息见http:// www. imdb. com/ title/ tt 0052618/ (last visited Jan. 21, 2015),and Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ, Trivia, IMDb,http:// www. imdb. com/ title/ tt0016641/trivia (last visited Jan. 30, 2015)。电影《指环王》中的信息见http:// www. imdb. com/ title/ tt 0120737/ (last visited Jan. 21, 2015),and Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, Trivia, IMDb, http:// www.imdb. com/ title/ tt 0120737/ trivia (last visited Jan. 30, 2015).
[39] See Dissent at 749-50, 751。
[40] See, e.g., 17 U.S.C. Ё 101, 103, 114, 201.
[41] 908 F.2d 555 (9th Cir.1990)(Kozinski, J.).
[42] See id. at 556 n. 2.
[43] See 1 Nimmer on Copyright?6.07[B][2].
[44] See Effects Assocs., 908 F.2d at559-60.
[45] See 17 U.S.C. ?203(a)(3).
[46] Pom Wonderful LLC v. Hubbard,775 F.3d 1118, 1122-23 (9th Cir.2014)(复审事实问题有无明显错误)(作者:吴祎 石振东,来源:华政东方知识产权)
相关阅读:
- 专家建议绘制专利地图助力我国通信行业抢占制高点 2015-06-04
- 商业秘密,请让我们来保护你! 2015-05-10
- 广西壮族自治区百色市英德冷饮部兰忠德侵犯百色市酒厂右江注 2015-05-10
- "抢”人商号还告人侵权 2015-05-10
- 有限责任公司的设立及法律地位主要有哪些 2015-06-05
- 2014年宁波十大版权事件评出 2015-06-02